Skip to content


Cuts to basic services jeopardize Oakland’s recovery

Tomorrow two groups of four Councilmembers will present competing budgets for adoption by the City of Oakland. By far the most controversial of all proposed cuts is Mayor Jean Quan’s threat to cut 90% of the staff of the Oakland Public Library, violating the terms of the 2004 Measure Q parcel tax that provides additional funding for library services. Some observers claim that the library needs to share the pain like everyone else – and Councilmembers are quick to assure constituents that preserving the library is their top priority – but a cursory look at the city budget shows the library is being unfairly targeted for reductions.

General Fund contribution for the library was $12.7m in 2008, and last year it was cut to the Measure Q minimum, $9.1m. That’s a 28% cut in just three years! Parks and Recreation has been cut by 14%, and Public Works cuts have left our streets in deplorable condition. Meanwhile, outside grants have declined by only a small amount, and the City Planning Department has suffered almost no funding reductions (less than 4% cut from the General Fund). The Police Department has seen its total funding increase over that period even though the services it provides have been cut to the point that crime victims are coming to the library to get help filling out reports.

It is a statement of the backwards priorities of the sclerotic City Council that the most basic city services have been decimated while bureaucrats who do not help the public, and grants that go to politically-active organizations, have kept most of their funding.

But this isn’t just a matter of the City Council’s priorities. In order for Oakland to reverse the cycle of budget cuts, there must be new investment to lift property values, increase employment, and boost tax receipts. New residents and investors don’t care about planning codes or grants for private programs. They care about clean and safe streets, and basic services like libraries, which is the best-used city service (if you don’t count parking tickets!). If the library is decimated in order for the City to continue funding programs grants or Mayoral advisors, we won’t be able to attract the kind of investment that is needed to get the city’s fiscal house in order.

If you’d like to tell your City Councilmembers to prioritize the library and basic services you can email them at the addresses below. The first four Councilmembers are one group and the second four are the other. You can also join me and many other library supporters as we read books in front of City Hall today.

  • nnadel@oaklandnet.com
  • pkernighan@oaklandnet.com
  • lschaaf@oaklandnet.com
  • rkaplan@oaklandnet.com
  • idelafuente@oaklandnet.com
  • lreid@oaklandnet.com
  • dbrooks@oaklandnet.com
  • jbrunner@oaklandnet.com

UPDATE June 21: Oakland City Council will hear budget proposals on June 28th.

Posted in california, citycouncil, oakland, taxes.


5 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. n schiff says

    Thank you for this excellent post.

  2. MarleenLee says

    Where are you getting your numbers for police funding? Police staffing is down 25% from its peak in 2008. We haven’t had a police academy since the end of 2008, and regular academies to keep staffing stable would generally run $9-10 million annually. So the City is saving on 200 unfilled police positions, plus the $9-$10 million annually for not holding academies. That totals somewhere in the neighborhood of $38 million savings each year. How can you say funding has increased?

  3. dto510 says

    Overall police funding has increased decreased by 7% but costs have escalated so quickly that we’re down hundreds of police officers since 2006 without saving many dollars. Without police academies, the force actually becomes more expensive per officer because the force becomes older. So while the average citizen is suffering due to a lack of adequate police presence, the city is only saving money relative to what it would cost to beef up the force to adequate levels. Of course, we can’t do that if we continue to pay one of the highest police compensation contracts in the country.

    FY 2006-2007 Police Services expenditures from General Fund (actual): $187m
    FY 2008-2009 Police Services expenditures from General Fund (actual): $206m
    FY 2010-2011 Mid Cycle Police Services budget from General Fund: $174m
    It’s slated to go down this budget but the Mayor’s scenario has it back to $185m in 2012.

    These data are from a spreadsheet that a city staffer gave me, I don’t know if there’s something this succinct online but all these figures are in the budgets.

  4. MarleenLee says

    Okay. So, police funding is actually down around $32 million from 2008/09. And I happen to know that the City doesn’t actually “budget” for police academies, so add another $8-10 million to that number, and police funding is probably down closer to around $40 million from its peak. That’s quite a bundle. But I completely agree that overall compensation packages to police officers are excessive and need to be rengotiated to more reasonable levels.

  5. V Smoothe says

    The total police department budget in 2006-07 was $198 million. The total police department budget in FY2010-11 was $198 million. The total police department budget proposed in the Mayor’s budget Scenario A for 2011-12 is $199 million.