<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why defend the indefensible?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libbyschaaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CORRECTED, at bottom. Though support for Occupy Oakland is clearly plunging quickly, I&#8217;m amazed there is any organized support left for the encampment following the utterly predictable events of Occupy’s big protest last Wednesday. The next day the City Council heard public testimony and a staff report about the illegal encampment that has forced them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Oakland need a new approach to transportation?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk lately about the perceived need for a Transportation Commission in Oakland, particularly after the City Council was forced to admit that they had no other use for over $100m in transportation funds that would be available if the Oakland Airport Connector were cancelled. Oakland is a city almost [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharing your opinion during the holiday</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/sharing-your-opinion-during-the-holiday/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/sharing-your-opinion-during-the-holiday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rockridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The holidays are the season of sharing. And there is nothing more precious to bloggers and commenters than one&#8217;s opinion. On Thanksgiving Eve, what could be more in tune with the holiday spirit than sharing one&#8217;s opinions?* There are several opportunities to comment on important plans and projects affecting Oakland, and thanks to email, your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/sharing-your-opinion-during-the-holiday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discussing citywide rezoning</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/discussing-citywide-rezoning/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/discussing-citywide-rezoning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow the City of Oakland will hold a &#8220;community meeting&#8221; on the citywide zoning update, which recently passed its Council-approved deadline to complete its work (it is nowhere near done). At North Oakland&#8217;s Peralta Elementary School (460 63rd St, entrance is on Alcatraz Ave) from 10a to noon, city planners will present their work and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/discussing-citywide-rezoning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland government&#8217;s woes reflected in parking proposal</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eager readers of the blogoaksphere certainly noticed many bloggers’ cause du jour – preventing the city from installing a surface parking lot in the middle of downtown’s up-and-coming Uptown neighborhood. The issue touched on a lot of the causes dear to bloggers’ hearts: pedestrian and transit-oriented planning, civic engagement, and enjoying nightlife. While advocates were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three years of Oakland&#8217;s future</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/three-years-of-oaklands-future/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/three-years-of-oaklands-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy birthday to this blog!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three years ago today, V Smoothe and I started this blog, FutureOakland (then on blogspot). We were disappointed by media coverage of the mayor’s race, and felt the minority of Oaklanders opposed to growth and revitalizing the city were completely dominating the public discussion of Oakland’s future. Under the reactionary handle of OaklandNative, I hoped [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/three-years-of-oaklands-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lowdown on parking in Uptown</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Becks and I have written, we and other pedestrian advocates are opposed to the construction of a surface parking lot on Telegraph Avenue at 19th St, next to the Fox Theater. The one hundred or so spaces created by this ugly lot could be found by better using existing parking resources, including the several [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uptown rises</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/02/uptown-rises/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/02/uptown-rises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrybrown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I graduated high school in 1997, my father took me and my sister on a photo-tour of Oakland’s most endangered landmarks, as published by the Oakland Heritage Alliance. We photographed the moldering Cox Cadillac Building, the abandoned Floral Depot Building, and, of course, the hulking ruin of the Fox Theater. I expected every one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/02/uptown-rises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for O-2-9</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnrusso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday January 20 2009 the Oakland City Council will vote on final environmental and legal approval of the showcase Oak-To-Ninth (O29) development on two peninsulas comprising 64 acres immediately east of the Jack London District straddling the Lake Merritt Channel. 170 boat slips in two marinas, 200,000 square feet of retail space, 32 acres of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#039;s time for O-2-9</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnrusso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday January 20 2009 the Oakland City Council will vote on final environmental and legal approval of the showcase Oak-To-Ninth (O29) development on two peninsulas comprising 64 acres immediately east of the Jack London District straddling the Lake Merritt Channel. 170 boat slips in two marinas, 200,000 square feet of retail space, 32 acres of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

