<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; janebrunner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/janebrunner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why defend the indefensible?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libbyschaaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CORRECTED, at bottom. Though support for Occupy Oakland is clearly plunging quickly, I&#8217;m amazed there is any organized support left for the encampment following the utterly predictable events of Occupy’s big protest last Wednesday. The next day the City Council heard public testimony and a staff report about the illegal encampment that has forced them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayor Quan as secretive as Mayor Dellums?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/03/mayor-quan-as-secretive-as-mayor-dellums/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/03/mayor-quan-as-secretive-as-mayor-dellums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libbyschaaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oakland is two months into the administration of Mayor Jean Quan. In one mayoral campaign mailer from 2010, Ms. Quan compared her approach to governance to an open door, in contrast with the closed, secretive decision-making of former Mayor Dellums or rival candidate Don Perata. Unfortunately, because of steps the Mayor and some Council Members [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/03/mayor-quan-as-secretive-as-mayor-dellums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election year begins, campaigns not yet</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2010/01/election-year-begins-campaigns-not-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2010/01/election-year-begins-campaigns-not-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 is of course an election year, and it&#8217;s looking like an exciting one in Oakland, with a likely open mayoral seat, perhaps an open Council seat, and two open County Supervisor seats. Two x-factors complicate the elections: the adoption of Ranked Choice Voting and November City elections; and the effect of campaign finance rules [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2010/01/election-year-begins-campaigns-not-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Oakland need a new approach to transportation?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk lately about the perceived need for a Transportation Commission in Oakland, particularly after the City Council was forced to admit that they had no other use for over $100m in transportation funds that would be available if the Oakland Airport Connector were cancelled. Oakland is a city almost [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Oakland weigh in on connector?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland airport connector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED to reflect correct meeting date, Thursday June 18. Next Thursday (June 18), the Oakland City Council Rules Committee will hear a request from Councilmember Nancy Nadel to agendize a discussion of the proposed Oakland Airport Connector project. Ms. Nadel will request the connector be discussed at the Public Works Committee, which she chairs, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland government&#8217;s woes reflected in parking proposal</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eager readers of the blogoaksphere certainly noticed many bloggers’ cause du jour – preventing the city from installing a surface parking lot in the middle of downtown’s up-and-coming Uptown neighborhood. The issue touched on a lot of the causes dear to bloggers’ hearts: pedestrian and transit-oriented planning, civic engagement, and enjoying nightlife. While advocates were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for O-2-9</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnrusso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday January 20 2009 the Oakland City Council will vote on final environmental and legal approval of the showcase Oak-To-Ninth (O29) development on two peninsulas comprising 64 acres immediately east of the Jack London District straddling the Lake Merritt Channel. 170 boat slips in two marinas, 200,000 square feet of retail space, 32 acres of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#039;s time for O-2-9</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnrusso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday January 20 2009 the Oakland City Council will vote on final environmental and legal approval of the showcase Oak-To-Ninth (O29) development on two peninsulas comprising 64 acres immediately east of the Jack London District straddling the Lake Merritt Channel. 170 boat slips in two marinas, 200,000 square feet of retail space, 32 acres of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three important transportation meetings</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/10/three-important-transportation-meetings/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/10/three-important-transportation-meetings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though Oakland does not have a Transportation Commission, the city does plan major transportation improvements. However, there’s no one resource for learning about proposals, no regularly scheduled meetings on transportation policy, and no consistent decision-making process. In the next seven days, three important public meetings offer the opportunity to aid the city’s transportation needs.   [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/10/three-important-transportation-meetings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Council Inclusionary Zoning Debate Recap</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desleybrooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrybrown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Tuesday featured one of the more exciting City Council meetings we have witnessed. We encourage people who were not able to attend to watch it on KTOP. But here&#8217;s a short recap of the action. Tuesday night&#8217;s City Council meeting opened to a full house of visitors waiting to speak either for or against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

