<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; kernighan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/kernighan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oakland government&#8217;s woes reflected in parking proposal</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eager readers of the blogoaksphere certainly noticed many bloggers’ cause du jour – preventing the city from installing a surface parking lot in the middle of downtown’s up-and-coming Uptown neighborhood. The issue touched on a lot of the causes dear to bloggers’ hearts: pedestrian and transit-oriented planning, civic engagement, and enjoying nightlife. While advocates were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lowdown on parking in Uptown</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Becks and I have written, we and other pedestrian advocates are opposed to the construction of a surface parking lot on Telegraph Avenue at 19th St, next to the Fox Theater. The one hundred or so spaces created by this ugly lot could be found by better using existing parking resources, including the several [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council calls emergency meeting to discuss Kids, cops</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/council-calls-emergency-meeting-to-discuss-kids-cops/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/council-calls-emergency-meeting-to-discuss-kids-cops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This afternoon, the City Council scheduled a special meeting for Wednesday evening (PDF). On the agenda are two ballot questions for November: the Kids First initiative, and the police services parcel tax. The drastic step of a last-minute special meeting during the recess, according to a source with knowledge of today&#8217;s action, was prompted by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/council-calls-emergency-meeting-to-discuss-kids-cops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dellums admits budget errors, prepares to make more</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/dellums-admits-budget-errors-prepares-to-make-more/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/dellums-admits-budget-errors-prepares-to-make-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patkernighan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This afternoon, our unpopular Mayor Ron Dellums held a press conference is an overcrowded city hearing room usually reserved for small committee meetings. Flanked by t-shirt-wearing city employee union activists, the police and fire chiefs, and interim City Administrator Dan Lindheim, Dellums announced that the budget “that was presented” (by him) and ratified by the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/dellums-admits-budget-errors-prepares-to-make-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council acknowledges failure of the LLAD</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/council-acknowledges-failure-of-the-llad/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/council-acknowledges-failure-of-the-llad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orpn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At closed session this morning, the Oakland City Council acknowledged that the renewal of the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District failed. After the city announced the assessment district passed in June, ORPN activist David Mix claimed that the consultants who ran the election miscalculated the proper voting weights of different parcels, including the decisive vote [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/07/council-acknowledges-failure-of-the-llad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>De la Fuente, Kernighan call for Edgerly&#8217;s ouster; did it happen?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/06/de-la-fuente-kernighan-call-for-edgerlys-ouster-did-it-happen-2/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/06/de-la-fuente-kernighan-call-for-edgerlys-ouster-did-it-happen-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edgerly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignacio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supporters of Ignacio de la Fuente and Pat Kernighan received emails in the last 18 hours calling for City Administrator Deborah Edgerly to be placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation. The councilmembers both note that the Council has no authority over the administrator, and say that they feel they have to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/06/de-la-fuente-kernighan-call-for-edgerlys-ouster-did-it-happen-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>De la Fuente, Kernighan call for Edgerly&#039;s ouster; did it happen?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/06/de-la-fuente-kernighan-call-for-edgerlys-ouster-did-it-happen/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/06/de-la-fuente-kernighan-call-for-edgerlys-ouster-did-it-happen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edgerly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignacio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supporters of Ignacio de la Fuente and Pat Kernighan received emails in the last 18 hours calling for City Administrator Deborah Edgerly to be placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation. The councilmembers both note that the Council has no authority over the administrator, and say that they feel they have to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/06/de-la-fuente-kernighan-call-for-edgerlys-ouster-did-it-happen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Council Inclusionary Zoning Debate Recap</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desleybrooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrybrown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Tuesday featured one of the more exciting City Council meetings we have witnessed. We encourage people who were not able to attend to watch it on KTOP. But here&#8217;s a short recap of the action. Tuesday night&#8217;s City Council meeting opened to a full house of visitors waiting to speak either for or against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

