<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; larryreid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/larryreid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does Oakland need a new approach to transportation?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk lately about the perceived need for a Transportation Commission in Oakland, particularly after the City Council was forced to admit that they had no other use for over $100m in transportation funds that would be available if the Oakland Airport Connector were cancelled. Oakland is a city almost [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Oakland weigh in on connector?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland airport connector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED to reflect correct meeting date, Thursday June 18. Next Thursday (June 18), the Oakland City Council Rules Committee will hear a request from Councilmember Nancy Nadel to agendize a discussion of the proposed Oakland Airport Connector project. Ms. Nadel will request the connector be discussed at the Public Works Committee, which she chairs, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland government&#8217;s woes reflected in parking proposal</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eager readers of the blogoaksphere certainly noticed many bloggers’ cause du jour – preventing the city from installing a surface parking lot in the middle of downtown’s up-and-coming Uptown neighborhood. The issue touched on a lot of the causes dear to bloggers’ hearts: pedestrian and transit-oriented planning, civic engagement, and enjoying nightlife. While advocates were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Council Inclusionary Zoning Debate Recap</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desleybrooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrybrown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Tuesday featured one of the more exciting City Council meetings we have witnessed. We encourage people who were not able to attend to watch it on KTOP. But here&#8217;s a short recap of the action. Tuesday night&#8217;s City Council meeting opened to a full house of visitors waiting to speak either for or against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

