<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; nadel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/nadel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why defend the indefensible?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libbyschaaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CORRECTED, at bottom. Though support for Occupy Oakland is clearly plunging quickly, I&#8217;m amazed there is any organized support left for the encampment following the utterly predictable events of Occupy’s big protest last Wednesday. The next day the City Council heard public testimony and a staff report about the illegal encampment that has forced them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Oakland weigh in on connector?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland airport connector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED to reflect correct meeting date, Thursday June 18. Next Thursday (June 18), the Oakland City Council Rules Committee will hear a request from Councilmember Nancy Nadel to agendize a discussion of the proposed Oakland Airport Connector project. Ms. Nadel will request the connector be discussed at the Public Works Committee, which she chairs, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/06/should-oakland-weigh-in-on-airport-connector-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland voters choose cops over kids</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/oakland-voters-choose-cops-over-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/oakland-voters-choose-cops-over-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measure nn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measure oo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In July, Councilmember Jean Quan presented an alternative to the Kids First 2 measure that would appear on the ballot as Measure OO. Though acknowledging that the city could ill-afford any funding increases, Ms. Quan held no hope that a Kids First 2 ballot measure could be defeated. “I know it will pass, because kids [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/oakland-voters-choose-cops-over-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endorsements and predictions: June 2008</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/05/endorsements-and-predictions-june-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/05/endorsements-and-predictions-june-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ousd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignacio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, everyone but the Trib is making endorsements in the many competitive elections in Oakland and the East Bay. So, like Robert Kennedy, I thought Why not? Here are my endorsements for who will make decision affecting the future of Oakland, from a transit and Smart Growth perspective.     City Council District One: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/05/endorsements-and-predictions-june-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elections, endorsements, and ideology &#8211; oh my!</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/05/elections-endorsements-and-ideology-oh-my/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/05/elections-endorsements-and-ideology-oh-my/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignacio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the elections come closer, voters are deluged with mailers and get many calls from politicians and volunteers seeking their support. Candidates and their literature trumpet endorsements, which the organizations issuing find very important. Endorsements are thought to be representative of the various interests that make up the endorsing groups. Curiously, the County Central Democrat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/05/elections-endorsements-and-ideology-oh-my/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From national to local, in the news</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/04/from-national-to-local-in-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/04/from-national-to-local-in-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignacio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, it doesn&#8217;t take top bloggers like V-Smoothe and Becks to shame me into posting more. I&#8217;m just pleased to be part of the conversation. This blog is FutureOakland: every day Oaklanders make decisions that shape the future. Therefore, the future is the present. Here are some recent news articles, from all over the country, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/04/from-national-to-local-in-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nadel takes credit for downtown zoning proposal</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/04/nadel-takes-credit-for-downtown-zoning-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/04/nadel-takes-credit-for-downtown-zoning-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last night&#8217;s League of Women Voters&#8217; debate, Nancy Nadel (who was generally bested by Sean Sullivan during the forty-five minute exchange) asserted that &#8220;what I&#8217;m proposing for zoning downtown&#8221; would harmonize economic and environmental development by concentrating high-rise development on Broadway adjacent to BART. I&#8217;m glad that she finally owned up to writing the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/04/nadel-takes-credit-for-downtown-zoning-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Council Inclusionary Zoning Debate Recap</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desleybrooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanquan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrybrown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Tuesday featured one of the more exciting City Council meetings we have witnessed. We encourage people who were not able to attend to watch it on KTOP. But here&#8217;s a short recap of the action. Tuesday night&#8217;s City Council meeting opened to a full house of visitors waiting to speak either for or against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/10/city-council-inclusionary-zoning-debate-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council committee meeting reveals selfish agenda</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/council-committee-meeting-reveals-selfish-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/council-committee-meeting-reveals-selfish-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/09/12/council-committee-meeting-reveals-selfish-agenda/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As our blog has been gaining readership steadily since the election, and other local blogs flourish, we are recently joined in the blogosphere by the Grand Lake Guardian. This represents a welcome increase in the fora for debate over Oakland&#8217;s future. Oakland Heritage Alliance President Naomi Schiff&#8217;s posting on the Guardian agitates against a 420-foot [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/council-committee-meeting-reveals-selfish-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A look at candidate endorsements &#8211; Neighborhood and Community Leaders</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/06/a-look-at-candidate-endorsements-neighborhood-and-community-leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/06/a-look-at-candidate-endorsements-neighborhood-and-community-leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[delafuente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/06/04/a-look-at-candidate-endorsements-neighborhood-and-community-leaders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that a good way to gauge how a candidate will perform in any aspect of their job is to look at whom the real stakeholders in the community are backing. I&#8217;ve been looking at the endorsements each candidate has received, and I found the results quite striking. (Lists of endorsements are from their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/06/a-look-at-candidate-endorsements-neighborhood-and-community-leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

