<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; o29</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/o29/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Transit advocates are making progress</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/10/transit-advocates-are-making-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/10/transit-advocates-are-making-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog is about decisions made today that shape the future. I often focus on transit and bike/ped issues because transportation is the fabric of Oakland, and can be the foundation of a healthier and more successful city. Last week, the Oakland City Council took on two vital and controversial transportation issues, parking pricing and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/10/transit-advocates-are-making-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for O-2-9</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnrusso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday January 20 2009 the Oakland City Council will vote on final environmental and legal approval of the showcase Oak-To-Ninth (O29) development on two peninsulas comprising 64 acres immediately east of the Jack London District straddling the Lake Merritt Channel. 170 boat slips in two marinas, 200,000 square feet of retail space, 32 acres of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#039;s time for O-2-9</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnrusso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday January 20 2009 the Oakland City Council will vote on final environmental and legal approval of the showcase Oak-To-Ninth (O29) development on two peninsulas comprising 64 acres immediately east of the Jack London District straddling the Lake Merritt Channel. 170 boat slips in two marinas, 200,000 square feet of retail space, 32 acres of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/its-time-for-o-2-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New year, new transportation opportunities</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/new-year-new-transportation-opportunities/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/new-year-new-transportation-opportunities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurekk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new year presents the opportunity to dream and hope for the new. It may seem that this is not the best moment to hope for new transit service: not only will a slipping economy mean less sales-tax revenue from which to fund local transit, but one state budget-balancing idea includes stripping local transit agencies [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/new-year-new-transportation-opportunities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Enrollment Forecast Fatally Flawed</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/school-enrollment-forecast-fatally-flawed/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/school-enrollment-forecast-fatally-flawed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ousd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/school-enrollment-forecast-fatally-flawed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although completely out of our hands, the possible development of OUSD&#8217;s Lake Merritt land has provoked an incredible amount of hand-wringing throughout Oakland. From anti-high-rise zealots aghast at the possibility of metropolitan-sized skyscrapers rising along the estuary, to Green Party socialists opposed to any sale of public property, to the school board members whose deserved [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/school-enrollment-forecast-fatally-flawed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Clerk Directed to Invalidate Oak to Ninth Referendum Petition</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/city-clerk-directed-to-invalidate-oak-to-ninth-referendum-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/city-clerk-directed-to-invalidate-oak-to-ninth-referendum-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breakingnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnrusso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/09/07/city-clerk-directed-to-invalidate-oak-to-ninth-referendum-petition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Russo&#8217;s office today issued an opinion (PDF &#8211; press release) directing Oakland&#8217;s city clerk to invalidate the Oak to Ninth Referendum Committee&#8217;s petition to place the Oak to Ninth project on the balllot. According to the City Attorney&#8217;s opinion (PDF &#8211; opinion), the petition violated California Elections Code by failing to attach the version [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/09/city-clerk-directed-to-invalidate-oak-to-ninth-referendum-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Park Petition Offering Cash for Signatures</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/08/anti-park-petition-offering-cash-for-signatures/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/08/anti-park-petition-offering-cash-for-signatures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/anti-park-petition-offering-cash-for-signatures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With only eight days to go, the regional groups fighting against Oakland&#8217;s 30-acre shoreline park and hundreds of units of affordable housing are now offering $1.50 per signature to petition gatherers. Without discussing the merits, their Craigslist ad promises up to $30 an hour (&#8220;if you&#8217;re good&#8221;). The coalition has therefore adopted the tactics of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/08/anti-park-petition-offering-cash-for-signatures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Growth Zealots Lie in Petition Drive</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/07/anti-growth-zealots-lie-in-petition-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/07/anti-growth-zealots-lie-in-petition-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2006/07/24/anti-growth-zealots-lie-in-petition-drive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a news conference last Friday, a group of anti-growth activists (along with the League of Women Voters, who apparently think that voters should decide every single thing) launched a petition drive to referend the Oak-to-Ninth development, stalling it until the next election. Unfortunately for the free flow of information and discussion, they resort to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2006/07/anti-growth-zealots-lie-in-petition-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

