<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; san francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/san-francisco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ferry failing, nobody notices</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/12/ferry-failing-nobody-notices/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/12/ferry-failing-nobody-notices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote last month about the many problems confronting Oakland&#8217;s transportation planning process. With civic leaders pushing new ballparks, my thoughts turned to the transportation aspects of planning a major entertainment destination. Two of the announced sites were West of Jack London Square, including a site called Jack London North that has stirred significant interest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/12/ferry-failing-nobody-notices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transit advocates are making progress</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/10/transit-advocates-are-making-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/10/transit-advocates-are-making-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog is about decisions made today that shape the future. I often focus on transit and bike/ped issues because transportation is the fabric of Oakland, and can be the foundation of a healthier and more successful city. Last week, the Oakland City Council took on two vital and controversial transportation issues, parking pricing and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/10/transit-advocates-are-making-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lowdown on parking in Uptown</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Becks and I have written, we and other pedestrian advocates are opposed to the construction of a surface parking lot on Telegraph Avenue at 19th St, next to the Fox Theater. The one hundred or so spaces created by this ugly lot could be found by better using existing parking resources, including the several [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/the-lowdown-on-parking-in-uptown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Grant protests miss the big picture</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/03/oscar-grant-protests-miss-the-big-picture/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/03/oscar-grant-protests-miss-the-big-picture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar grant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I had an hour between meetings to have coffee with my mother in Rockridge. I thought it would be a good opportunity to twitter the latest BART protest, and hopefully to pick up a few more readers of my microblog thanks to intrepid, live reporting of what promised to be a large and potentially [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/03/oscar-grant-protests-miss-the-big-picture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland Police should investigate riot, not BART</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/opd-should-investigate-riot-not-bart/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/opd-should-investigate-riot-not-bart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dellums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hayward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar grant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Mayor Dellums announced that the Oakland Police Department would investigate the killing of Oscar Grant III by a BART police officer on a BART platform. There is no reason the Oakland PD should undertake such an investigation. Mr. Grant, a resident of Hayward, was arrested because of his involvement in a fight that began [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/01/opd-should-investigate-riot-not-bart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIMBY initiatives lose across California</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/nimby-initiatives-lose-across-california/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/nimby-initiatives-lose-across-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beverly hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurej]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurekk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redwood city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa monica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the clock runs out on election interest, this is the first of two blogs noting electoral trends. Real estate development is a political football in many cities in California, with some battles reaching the ballot box. This November, NIMBY initiatives across the state were defeated. The three most radical anti-growth measures in California were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/nimby-initiatives-lose-across-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland transit totally screwed, as usual</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/11/oakland-transit-totally-screwed-as-usual/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/11/oakland-transit-totally-screwed-as-usual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highspeedrail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transit advocates had reason to cheer on Election Day. California voters endorsed high-speed rail, Berkeley voters overwhelmingly rejected a measure intended to halt Bus Rapid Transit, and East Bay voters ignored the noise about Van Hools and approved a transit tax to make up for state budget cuts. But as the euphoria fades, it’s increasingly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/11/oakland-transit-totally-screwed-as-usual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

