<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; taxis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/taxis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Transportation commissions in other cities</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/12/transportation-commissions-in-other-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/12/transportation-commissions-in-other-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I wrote about the problems with Oakland&#8217;s transportation decision-making process. Existing problems include not only a lack of planning for future investment, but flawed approaches to oversight of public and private transportation projects in an near Oakland for compliance with city goals, poor coordination with other cities and agencies, and an almost incoherent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/12/transportation-commissions-in-other-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Oakland need a new approach to transportation?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk lately about the perceived need for a Transportation Commission in Oakland, particularly after the City Council was forced to admit that they had no other use for over $100m in transportation funds that would be available if the Oakland Airport Connector were cancelled. Oakland is a city almost [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTO Nightlife: Far from footloose and fancy-free</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/05/dto-nightlife-far-from-footloose-and-fancy-free/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/05/dto-nightlife-far-from-footloose-and-fancy-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Oakland it seems that one has to attend a late-night City Council meeting to spend late nights out clubbing. With dancing all but illegal, our grittier, more crowded version of the small town from Footloose forces nightlife lovers to engage in elaborately choreographed routines to appeal to public sympathy, with no guarantee of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/05/dto-nightlife-far-from-footloose-and-fancy-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland government&#8217;s woes reflected in parking proposal</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cityworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernighan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eager readers of the blogoaksphere certainly noticed many bloggers’ cause du jour – preventing the city from installing a surface parking lot in the middle of downtown’s up-and-coming Uptown neighborhood. The issue touched on a lot of the causes dear to bloggers’ hearts: pedestrian and transit-oriented planning, civic engagement, and enjoying nightlife. While advocates were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/04/oakland-governments-woes-reflected-in-parking-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland transit totally screwed, as usual</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/11/oakland-transit-totally-screwed-as-usual/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/11/oakland-transit-totally-screwed-as-usual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highspeedrail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transit advocates had reason to cheer on Election Day. California voters endorsed high-speed rail, Berkeley voters overwhelmingly rejected a measure intended to halt Bus Rapid Transit, and East Bay voters ignored the noise about Van Hools and approved a transit tax to make up for state budget cuts. But as the euphoria fades, it’s increasingly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/11/oakland-transit-totally-screwed-as-usual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three important transportation meetings</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/10/three-important-transportation-meetings/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/10/three-important-transportation-meetings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though Oakland does not have a Transportation Commission, the city does plan major transportation improvements. However, there’s no one resource for learning about proposals, no regularly scheduled meetings on transportation policy, and no consistent decision-making process. In the next seven days, three important public meetings offer the opportunity to aid the city’s transportation needs.   [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/10/three-important-transportation-meetings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

