<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureOakland &#187; zoning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/category/zoning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Transportation is Oakland&#8217;s key environmental opportunity</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2010/03/transportation-is-oaklands-key-environmental-opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2010/03/transportation-is-oaklands-key-environmental-opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This afternoon the Climate Action Coalition, made up of social-justice and transit advocacy organizations, will rally before a City Council meeting on the Energy and Climate Action Plan (ECAP). Their demand? Improve Oakland&#8217;s environment while creating opportunities for job growth and public health. Transportation is the source of two-thirds of Oakland&#8217;s Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2010/03/transportation-is-oaklands-key-environmental-opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Oakland need a new approach to transportation?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janebrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larryreid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk lately about the perceived need for a Transportation Commission in Oakland, particularly after the City Council was forced to admit that they had no other use for over $100m in transportation funds that would be available if the Oakland Airport Connector were cancelled. Oakland is a city almost [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/does-oakland-need-a-new-approach-to-transportation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discussing citywide rezoning</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/discussing-citywide-rezoning/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/discussing-citywide-rezoning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow the City of Oakland will hold a &#8220;community meeting&#8221; on the citywide zoning update, which recently passed its Council-approved deadline to complete its work (it is nowhere near done). At North Oakland&#8217;s Peralta Elementary School (460 63rd St, entrance is on Alcatraz Ave) from 10a to noon, city planners will present their work and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/11/discussing-citywide-rezoning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uptown rises</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/02/uptown-rises/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/02/uptown-rises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrybrown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I graduated high school in 1997, my father took me and my sister on a photo-tour of Oakland’s most endangered landmarks, as published by the Oakland Heritage Alliance. We photographed the moldering Cox Cadillac Building, the abandoned Floral Depot Building, and, of course, the hulking ruin of the Fox Theater. I expected every one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/02/uptown-rises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTO zoning delay deleterious for downtown</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/dto-zoning-delay-deleterious-for-downtown/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/dto-zoning-delay-deleterious-for-downtown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citycouncil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last year, the Zoning Update Committee of the Oakland Planning Commission has grappled with downtown zoning as part of the citywide zoning update. Though originally intended to be completed by June for City Council passage in July, the Zoning Update Committee has not yet forwarded recommendations to the full Planning Commission, let alone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/dto-zoning-delay-deleterious-for-downtown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIMBY initiatives lose across California</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/nimby-initiatives-lose-across-california/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/nimby-initiatives-lose-across-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actransit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogoaksphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beverly hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurej]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurekk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redwood city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa monica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the clock runs out on election interest, this is the first of two blogs noting electoral trends. Real estate development is a political football in many cities in California, with some battles reaching the ballot box. This November, NIMBY initiatives across the state were defeated. The three most radical anti-growth measures in California were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/12/nimby-initiatives-lose-across-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTO at ZUC: Where&#8217;s the whimsy?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/09/dto-at-zuc-wheres-the-whimsy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/09/dto-at-zuc-wheres-the-whimsy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When confronting the pages, planners and paperwork intended to shape downtown Oakland for the next generation, the technical nature of the regulations and the tediousness of the process make it easy to lose sight of the values and desires we all share for urban areas. Fun is not something usually associated with the planning process, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/09/dto-at-zuc-wheres-the-whimsy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTO at ZUC: Where&#039;s the whimsy?</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/09/dto-at-zuc-wheres-the-whimsy/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/09/dto-at-zuc-wheres-the-whimsy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planningcommission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When confronting the pages, planners and paperwork intended to shape downtown Oakland for the next generation, the technical nature of the regulations and the tediousness of the process make it easy to lose sight of the values and desires we all share for urban areas. Fun is not something usually associated with the planning process, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2008/09/dto-at-zuc-wheres-the-whimsy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Century, New Zoning</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2007/11/new-century-new-zoning/</link>
		<comments>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2007/11/new-century-new-zoning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/new-century-new-zoning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, V Smoothe and I have been providing policy proposals with the stated goal of increasing housing affordability. Floating a housing bond, or dedicating funds to low-income housing programs, are ways to increase affordable-housing funds without discouraging market-rate construction. Master EIRs are one way to ease development of both market-rate and affordable housing construction. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2007/11/new-century-new-zoning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

