<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FutureOakland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoaklandblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:03:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why defend the indefensible? by Moral Failures in Oakland &#171; George Willcoxon</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Moral Failures in Oakland &#171; George Willcoxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=651#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>[...] You would be mistaken. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You would be mistaken. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why defend the indefensible? by V Smoothe</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=651#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>If she did not support the encampment as of last Thursday, then Schaaf&#039;s speech was definitely not clear at all. After rewatching it, I don&#039;t see how a reasonable viewer could have drawn any other conclusion.

One thing that Schaaf was unequivocal about in her speech was that she &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; support the day-long shutdown of downtown which disrupted transportation for tens of thousands of people, forced local businesses to close out of fears for safety of their employees, deprived people of childcare and wages, and denied the public access to city services. She specifically referred to it as &quot;beautiful and powerful.&quot; So while it is nice to hear that Schaaf doesn&#039;t want the encampment to stay permanently, I still think it is worth asking how she justifies her support for the strike, which was just as damaging to downtown Oakland, if not more so, than the camp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she did not support the encampment as of last Thursday, then Schaaf&#8217;s speech was definitely not clear at all. After rewatching it, I don&#8217;t see how a reasonable viewer could have drawn any other conclusion.</p>
<p>One thing that Schaaf was unequivocal about in her speech was that she <em>did</em> support the day-long shutdown of downtown which disrupted transportation for tens of thousands of people, forced local businesses to close out of fears for safety of their employees, deprived people of childcare and wages, and denied the public access to city services. She specifically referred to it as &#8220;beautiful and powerful.&#8221; So while it is nice to hear that Schaaf doesn&#8217;t want the encampment to stay permanently, I still think it is worth asking how she justifies her support for the strike, which was just as damaging to downtown Oakland, if not more so, than the camp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why defend the indefensible? by George</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=651#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why defend the indefensible? by MarleenLee</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/11/why-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>MarleenLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=651#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>Amen.   A voice of sanity in the wilderness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.   A voice of sanity in the wilderness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mayor Quan as secretive as Mayor Dellums? by Recall Jean Quan</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/03/mayor-quan-as-secretive-as-mayor-dellums/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Recall Jean Quan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=607#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Recall Jean Quan!
https://www.facebook.com/recalljeanquan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall Jean Quan!<br />
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/recalljeanquan" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/recalljeanquan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five years of Oakland&#8217;s Future by dto510</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/04/five-years-of-oaklands-future/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=632#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>Thanks Navigator! Yeah V is taking a break, but she&#039;ll be back - though maybe in a different form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Navigator! Yeah V is taking a break, but she&#8217;ll be back &#8211; though maybe in a different form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five years of Oakland&#8217;s Future by Navigator</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/04/five-years-of-oaklands-future/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=632#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>Great job DTO.  Also, what has happened to A Better Oakland? Is V taking a break?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job DTO.  Also, what has happened to A Better Oakland? Is V taking a break?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uptown rises by Another magical night in downtown Oakland &#171; Living in the O</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2009/02/uptown-rises/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Another magical night in downtown Oakland &#171; Living in the O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoakland.wordpress.com/?p=441#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>[...] still more to be done to improve downtown Oakland. As dto510 mentioned last week, the City needs to complete its sidewalk improvements in Uptown. We need more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still more to be done to improve downtown Oakland. As dto510 mentioned last week, the City needs to complete its sidewalk improvements in Uptown. We need more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cuts to basic services jeopardize Oakland&#8217;s recovery by V Smoothe</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/06/service-cuts-jeopardize-recovery/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=644#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>The total police department budget in 2006-07 was $198 million. The total police department budget in FY2010-11 was $198 million. The total police department budget proposed in the Mayor&#039;s budget Scenario A for 2011-12 is $199 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The total police department budget in 2006-07 was $198 million. The total police department budget in FY2010-11 was $198 million. The total police department budget proposed in the Mayor&#8217;s budget Scenario A for 2011-12 is $199 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cuts to basic services jeopardize Oakland&#8217;s recovery by MarleenLee</title>
		<link>http://futureoaklandblog.com/2011/06/service-cuts-jeopardize-recovery/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>MarleenLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoaklandblog.com/?p=644#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Okay.  So, police funding is actually down around $32 million from 2008/09.  And I happen to know that the City doesn&#039;t actually &quot;budget&quot; for police academies, so add another $8-10 million to that number, and police funding is probably down closer to around $40 million from its peak.  That&#039;s quite a bundle.  But I completely agree that overall compensation packages to police officers are excessive and need to be rengotiated to more reasonable levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay.  So, police funding is actually down around $32 million from 2008/09.  And I happen to know that the City doesn&#8217;t actually &#8220;budget&#8221; for police academies, so add another $8-10 million to that number, and police funding is probably down closer to around $40 million from its peak.  That&#8217;s quite a bundle.  But I completely agree that overall compensation packages to police officers are excessive and need to be rengotiated to more reasonable levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

